The Research Behind LombokWhat Two Independent Institutions Found
Before committing capital to any market, serious investors ask what the independent research says — not what developers say. For Lombok, the answer comes from two entirely separate institutional research programmes that were conducted four years apart, by different organisations with different methodologies, and that reached the same strategic conclusions.
The World Bank Market Analysis (2016)
Who prepared it and why
In August 2016, the World Bank engaged Horwath HTL and Surbana Jurong to conduct a rigorous market analysis and demand assessment for Lombok as part of a broader assessment of Indonesia's ten priority tourism destinations.
Horwath HTL is the world's leading specialist hospitality and tourism consultancy, with offices across six continents and a client list spanning the world's largest hotel groups, private equity investors, and development finance institutions. Surbana Jurong is one of Asia's largest infrastructure and urban planning consultancies. Their combined work was produced under World Bank Selection #1223583.
The methodology included primary interviews with domestic and foreign investors, surveys of tour operators in key international source markets — Australia, France, Germany, Malaysia, Singapore, China, Japan, the UK, and the US — field visits across all tourism areas, analysis of hotel performance data, and comprehensive secondary research. This was not a desk exercise. It was the most thorough independent commercial assessment of Lombok's tourism market produced to that point.
Source: World Bank MADA, Horwath HTL / Surbana Jurong, 2016
What they found
International visitors to Lombok grew fourfold between 2009 and 2015, at a CAGR of 33% — among the fastest growth rates of any destination in Indonesia.
In 2015, total visitors reached 1,982,427 — roughly half international (1,029,779) and half domestic (952,648).
Lombok had retained its image as an ‘unspoiled paradise, a Bali as it once was’ — a genuine competitive differentiator with documented resonance across all major source markets.
European visitors accounted for 50% of international arrivals, with Australia at 18%, ASEAN at 11%, and the Americas at 10%. Asian markets (China, Japan, India) were almost entirely absent — representing a large untapped growth opportunity once the right product existed.
Star-rated hotel occupancy reached 68–79% in Senggigi and 70–78% on the Gili Islands — strong performance for a destination at this stage of development.
The southern coast was identified as Lombok’s primary future development zone, with Mandalika, Selong Belanak, Sekotong, and Pink Beach all designated as priority areas.
Private investors were in a ‘wait and see’ posture — not because the opportunity was in doubt, but because no single investor was willing to take the first-mover risk without government commitment. The Mandalika SEZ was identified as the trigger.
The Best Case scenario — premised on significant government support for Mandalika and the southern coast, sustained environmental management of the Gili Islands, and improving international air connectivity — projected total visitor expenditure reaching USD 1.7 billion annually by 2041: 4.5 times the 2015 baseline. In contrast, the Business as Usual scenario yielded only USD 751 million — demonstrating that USD 915 million in annual economic value hinged specifically on whether the government committed to the investment programme.
Source: World Bank MADA, Horwath HTL / Surbana Jurong, 2016
The Integrated Tourism Master Plan (2020)
Who prepared it and why
In 2020, the Indonesian Government commissioned PT AECOM Indonesia — the local arm of AECOM, the world's largest infrastructure company — to produce the Integrated Tourism Master Plan for Lombok. The report was prepared for Badan Pengembangan Infrastruktur Wilayah (BPIW), the Agency for Regional Infrastructure Development within Indonesia's Ministry of Public Works and Housing (Kementerian PUPR).
The ITMP is not an advisory report. It is a 444-page, 25-year legal and operational planning framework. Every planning approval, infrastructure investment decision, zoning determination, and government budget allocation affecting tourism on Lombok Island references this document. It was developed through stakeholder consultation, environmental analysis, economic modelling, spatial planning, and detailed scenario assessment.
Source: PT AECOM Indonesia for the Government of Indonesia (Kementerian PUPR), February 2020
What they found
Total visitors had grown to 2.9 million by 2017 (1.7 million domestic, 1.2 million international), with strong underlying demand interrupted by the 2018 earthquakes.
Total investment in Lombok between 2009 and 2017 reached Rp 18.6 trillion, of which 65% came from foreign direct investment. Tourism absorbed the single largest share of FDI — 65% of the total.
Singapore accounted for 58% of all FDI by country. Approximately 30 countries had active investments in the island by 2017.
Under the Intervention Scenario, Lombok is projected to receive 12 million visitors per year by 2045 — three times the Business as Usual figure of 4.1 million. The ITMP uses Bali’s own post-infrastructure growth trajectory as the benchmark for this projection.
The accommodation requirement under the Intervention Scenario grows from 11,582 rooms in 2017 to 93,975 by 2045 — requiring approximately 1,702 new hotels and 85,088 rooms across 1,276 hectares of commercial land.
The Southern Coast KTA is designated as the highest-priority investment zone, with over 40% of all new tourism land allocation directed to the Praya-Mandalika sub-zone alone.
The island’s total tourism carrying capacity ceiling is set at 15.7 million visitors per year — the 12 million target is deliberately designed to remain below this limit, protecting the quality of the destination permanently.
Source: AECOM Integrated Tourism Master Plan for Lombok, prepared for Government of Indonesia (BPIW / Kementerian PUPR), 2020
Where the Two Reports Agree
Despite being produced by different organisations, with different briefs, four years apart, both reports reach the same strategic conclusions:
The southern coast is the primary investment zone
Both the World Bank MADA and the AECOM ITMP identify Mandalika, Selong Belanak, Sekotong, and Pink Beach as Lombok’s critical future tourism areas.
Government commitment is the investment trigger
Both reports observed that private capital was waiting for the government’s first-mover commitment at Mandalika before deploying at scale. That commitment is now fully established.
Accommodation supply is structurally insufficient
Both analyses project demand outpacing supply through every planning phase, creating durable return conditions for early entrants.
Lombok should not replicate Bali
Both reports explicitly recommend that Lombok protect its natural and cultural assets through planning controls, zoning, and environmental management — learning from the mistakes that degraded Bali.
Air connectivity is the single most powerful demand multiplier
Both reports identify improved international direct flights as the primary mechanism for unlocking the Asian and Middle Eastern visitor markets that are currently almost entirely absent from Lombok.
Continue Reading
Explore the investment case, the government's master plan, and the market data that supports these findings.
Enquire About Saraya Resort
Read the full investment case and discover how Saraya Resort fits within Lombok's growth trajectory — backed by the most rigorous research available.